53 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Rome, Monticelso and Francisco prepare to charge Vittoria with the murder of Camillo. The Register and the Chancellor prepare the scene for the trial while Monticelso and Francisco talk about their plan to ruin Vittoria’s reputation, even though they have no real evidence that she is guilty. As these men leave, Flaminio enters with Marcello and a lawyer. The lawyer criticizes the brothers, claiming that their sister Vittoria will be easily convicted if anyone can prove that she “but kissed” Bracciano. Flaminio turns the lawyer’s comments into sexual jokes as a way to distract from his own role in the murder. Marcello is miserable. He criticizes his brother for helping Bracciano and Vittoria in their immoral acts. Flaminio defends himself, claiming that he wanted to help the family. He claims that Marcello works for Francisco for a pitiable amount, and this comment prompts Marcello to defend himself and insult Flaminio.
A number of foreign ambassadors enter. They will be the judges at the trial. The Savoy ambassador and the French ambassador take their seats. Flaminio makes jokes with the lawyer, alleging that the French ambassador impotent. The English ambassador and the Spanish ambassador enter, and Flaminio mocks them, too.
Vittoria’s trial begins with the arraignment. As the characters enter, Bracciano is told that he has no chair. He lays out his expensive gown and places himself upon it. Monticelso summons Vittoria and Zanche. When the plea is read in Latin, Vittoria asks for it to be read in the “usual tongue” for everyone to understand, believing that the use of Latin could cause confusion during the trial. Francisco accepts this request. The lawyer delivers an indulgent and nonsensical speech that condemns the “debauched and diversivolent” (III.ii.29) Vittoria. When she protests, the lawyer is dismissed.
Monticelso leads the case for the prosecution. He accuses Vittoria of being a “whore,” and when she asks for clarification, he likens prostitutes to taxes and Russian winters. Vittoria denies her guilt. The ambassadors confer. Though they find that Vittoria has lived an immoral life, they also do not trust the “bitter” Monticelso to be impartial. Monticelso and Francisco accuse Vittoria of murdering Camillo. Vittoria falls to her knees and begs the ambassadors for forgiveness for her personality. Her brave stance impresses the ambassadors, prompting Vittoria to chide Monticelso for the way in which she has turned his insulting accusations against him.
Monticelso next asks Vittoria about the night her husband was killed. He asks who was in her home. At this point, Bracciano stands and claims that he was with her on the night in question. He claims to have been helping Camillo to settle a debt that Camillo owed to Monticelso. At this, Monticelso accuses Bracciano of sexual impropriety. Bracciano insults Monticelso and storms out, abandoning the expensive gown. Francisco announces that this chaos indicates the lack of evidence against Vittoria. He defends his sister’s soul, claiming that she could never be a killer.
Monticelso responds by producing a letter written to Vittoria by Bracciano. In the letter, he invites her to his summer house. Vittoria insists that this is simply an invitation; they do not have her negative response. The invitation may condemn Bracciano, she claims, but not her. She believes that Monticelso is persecuting her unfairly. Next, Monticelso produces evidence showing that Bracciano sent money to Vittoria. She insists that this was to settle her husband’s debt, then accuses Monticelso of lacking impartiality in his dual role as prosecutor and judge. She calls on the ambassadors and the audience to judge her instead of Monticelso. Next, Monticelso tells a story about Vittoria’s marriage to Camillo. He claims that Camillo did not receive a dowry for the marriage and that Vittoria was frequently unfaithful.
Monticelso prepares his judgement. He orders Marcello and Flaminio to remain close by, though he has no real evidence to convict them as accomplices. Monticelso finds Vittoria guilty. He sentences her to be sent to a house of convertites: a place where “penitent whores” are sent. Vittoria cries out for vengeance. She accuses Monticelso of abusing justice itself as she is taken from the court.
Bracciano returns in a daze. He is clearly upset as he mumbles incoherently to Francisco, then exits again. Flaminio offers his congratulations to Bracciano on a performance well done. He also reminds himself to show his grief to others to convince them that he is stricken with emotion following Vittoria’s conviction. That way, he believes, no one will think that he is guilty. Flamino exits, to be replaced by Giovanni and Lodovico. Giovanni is dressed in black clothes of mourning. He tells his uncle that Isabella is dead. Monticelso suggests to the ambassadors that they should leave and Giovanni continues to mourn his mother’s demise. He speaks to Francisco, asking about the afterlife. Francisco is very upset. He sends everyone away and mourns Isabella alone.
Flaminio distractedly enters, performing his grief for everyone to see. Marcello and Lodovico follow and hear him lament his luck and curse his fate of having to serve Bracciano. The Savoy ambassador appears and tries to comfort him, but Flaminio rejects his approach. The French ambassador insists that Vittoria was clearly guilty, so Flaminio accuses Monticelso of “corruption.” He airs these same complaints and more to the English ambassador. When the ambassadors leave, Flaminio turns on Marcello and levies a series of subtle jibes against him, referencing the biblical story of Cain killing his brother, Abel. Flaminio exits. Lodovico privately considers Flaminio’s comments and wants to learn more about him. When Flaminio reappears, he is surprised to see Lodovico, who as far as he knows, is still banished. They insult one another.
Gasparo and Antonelli appear, sharing a laugh. Flaminio and Lodovico continue to exchange insults, but they eventually agree to put their spat aside. Antonelli informs Lodovico that the dying Pope has signed a pardon, ending his banishment. Lodovico is overcome with joy. Overwhelmed, he insults Vittoria, so Flaminio lashes out at him. Marcello drags Flaminio away. Upset by the sudden attack, Lodovico dismisses Flaminio as a “lousy” pimp. He resolves to forget about the matter and celebrate the end of his banishment with alcohol.
In Act 2, the preparations for Vittoria’s trial and the arrival of the foreign ambassadors illustrate the extent to which the characters are concerned with Performative Virtue as a Mask for Vice. Because these foreign dignitaries will sit in on the trial and bear witness to the stark discussions of Italian immorality, Francisco becomes concerned that they will return to their homelands and spread the news that the people of Rome lack morality. Given his investment in maintaining a respectable image for the sake of his country, Francisco stands as a direct contrast to Bracciano, who gives no thought to the fact that his impulsive and selfish actions will now tarnish Italy’s international reputation. Yet even with Francisco’s conscientious approach to the matter, it is clear that he is more concerned with the performative nature of virtue than with its substance.
While Francisco leans toward concealment in order to protect the country’s public image, Monticelso actively advocates for the ambassadors’ presence, arguing that a proper prosecution of Vittoria will show the world that Italy holds people accountable for their immoral actions. He therefore uses the trial as an example of performative virtue, for Bracciano remains a free man despite playing a role in the murders of Camillo and Isabella. Thus, the trial scene makes it clear that Monticelso is far more interested in using these proceedings to publicly demonstrate Italy’s institutional commitment to justice rather than seeing real justice done. He cynically reasons that as long as the ambassadors can see that some form of justice is taking place, the precise details of that justice are not important—only the spectacle of justice itself.
Notably, Monticelso’s decision to invite the ambassadors to this important event also reveals that he too is subject to The Corruptive Effects of Ambition, for the trial is a prelude to the conclave in which these same ambassadors will elect him Pope. Therefore, the public performance of justice in Vittoria’s trial also functions as subtle propaganda for Monticelso’s future election. By using Vittoria’s trial as a platform, Monticelso can present himself to the world as a pious and powerful man who defends the values of the church against the immorality of women such as Vittoria. However, the actual events of the trial undermine his efforts to create a self-serving narrative, for he shows more interested in describing the salacious details of Vittoria’s affair than in rendering a balanced judgment on the matter. Specifically, when Vittoria repeatedly criticizes Monticelso for his hypocrisy by drawing attention to his dual role as judge and prosecutor, her words threaten to undermine the legitimacy of the court, giving the lie to his sanctimonious efforts.
This dynamic is only cut short when Francisco takes over the questioning and reasserts institutional authority. Notably, Francisco does not charge Vittoria with murder on the basis of Monticelso’s flimsy evidence, for he knows that he must seek his revenge against Bracciano outside the court if he is to be effective, as the court will not produce anything resembling justice. For this reason, Francisco puts Vittoria’s moral character on trial instead, and a relieved Monticelso finds her guilty of infidelity, even though her affair with the unpunished Bracciano is already public knowledge. With the farce of a trial nearing its conclusion, it is clear that the entire affair has undermined the institutional legitimacy of the court system, for Vittoria merely laughs when Monticelso orders that she be sent away to a house for reformed sex workers. Thus, Monticelso’s attempt to boost his public profile nearly fails, and Vittoria emerges as an empowered, if guilty, moral authority in her own right.
Throughout the spectacle of the trial, Flaminio remains a peripheral presence, making snide comments about the ambassadors and offering his opinions on the proceedings, but because the character’s antics are relegated to the sidelines, Webster implicitly emphasizes Flaminio’s lack of any real social standing. His sister is the one on trial, and yet he is not deemed worthy of standing up and making a statement, and his very lack of a public voice demonstrates that he cannot compete with the social presence and authority of powerful men like Francisco. Even Bracciano, who is known to be deeply involved in the affair, has more of a presence in the court than Flaminio does. Flaminio’s snide antics therefore constitute a reminder that he is motivated by The Corruptive Effects of Ambition to find a way to transcend his lowly social status. Additionally, when he witnesses the competing authorities of Bracciano and Francisco, he realizes that he may have erred in allying himself so closely with the emotional, impulsive Bracciano, but he knows that he is so deeply enmeshed in Bracciano’s world that he has no choice but to continue their immoral alliance.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Tragic Plays
View Collection