53 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Flaminio is closely related to many of the characters. As well as being Cornelia’s son, he is also the brother of both Vittoria and Marcello, and he has a close working relationship with Bracciano, whom he serves as an aide. However, despite these connections, Flaminio positions himself as an enemy to many, including his closest family members. He therefore emerges as the scheming, manipulative antagonist of the play. Flaminio’s plots are inspired by his desire to improve his family’s social standing. In the wealthy Italian cities of Rome and Padua, Flaminio sees the wealth and luxury enjoyed by the other families and resents his father for squandering whatever fortune his family once had. His plots are designed to lift his family up the social ladder, but to achieve his goals, he is willing to break every moral expectation of the era. Flaminio envies the rich and powerful and is so determined to join their ranks that he uses unethical means to endear himself to the wealthy Bracciano. He also tries to broker an affair between the married Bracciano and his own married sister, Vittoria. Through his relationship with Bracciano, Flaminio shows that he will do or say anything to win Bracciano’s approval and move himself closer to the wealthy elite. He even goes so far as to participate in a plot to murder Vittoria’s husband, Camillo, on Bracciano’s orders. Bracciano then demands that Flaminio insult his own sister, at which point Flaminio obsequiously joins him, proving that he is willing to kill his own brother-in-law and insult his beloved sister just to win the approval of the rich.
However, Flaminio’s lack of shame and morality does not go unnoticed, for his mother, Cornelia, is horrified by her son’s true nature. She compares Flaminio to her other son, the pious and reserved Marcello, and condemns Flaminio. Her condemnation reveals that although Flaminio claims to be acting in the name of his family, he does not truly care about them; his only concern is to elevate his own social standing. To achieve this goal, Flaminio treats his sister Vittoria like a commodity, bartering her virtue and reputation in exchange for Bracciano’s approval. He also kills his own brother-in-law for the same reason, and he kills Marcello because he cannot stand to be compared to his pious, moral brother. Marcello’s death is a breaking point for Cornelia and for Flaminio. As Cornelia experiences a mental health crisis over the murder of Marcello, Flaminio can no longer delude himself that he is scheming for his family’s benefit.
By the end of the play, Flaminio’s ambitious schemes cost him everything. Not only has he lost his family and his chance at improving their fortunes, but he has also lost the moral pretense that he is working for a noble cause. He accepts his immorality and his failure, which is why he confronts his sister with the demand that they must take their own lives. He tricks Vittoria into betraying him, only for his final scheme to reveal that his relationship with Vittoria is completely obliterated. Only at the very end of his life does Flaminio stop to reflect, and he finally realizes the damage that his schemes have wrought. In this moment, Flaminio understands that he has become corrupted, and although he cannot atone for his actions, his newfound inclination toward penitence and regret suggests that he is the character who is the most profoundly changed by the events of the play.
Vittoria’s acts of scheming and infidelity provide the driving force for much of the plot. At the beginning of the play, she is married to Camillo, but because her family has fallen on hard times, she believes that an affair and an eventual marriage with Bracciano can bring her the wealth and status that she craves. While Flaminio plots and schemes by bartering, lying, and making deals, Vittoria has far fewer tools for social mobility at her disposal. In the patriarchal society of the Italian Renaissance, women are marginalized, and Vittoria has far less power than her brothers, her lovers, or her husband. For this reason, she weaponizes her sexuality to attain a higher social status, seducing Bracciano and convincing him to kill Camillo. Thus, Vittoria’s sexuality becomes the foundation for the play’s complex portrayal of gender and sex. Despite her ostensibly powerless role in this patriarchal society, she can easily manipulate the men around her to achieve her own ends, using her sexuality as the only viable tool that society allows her to wield.
Vittoria’s social climbing is initially successful as she embarks on an affair with Bracciano and indirectly eliminates her husband. However, the play also depicts society’s attempts to curb women’s attempts to assert their own personal power in a patriarchal world. When she is put on trial, her sexuality is publicly policed by patriarchal religious figures, and she is summarily punished for daring to challenge male authority and for using her sexuality to do so. The trial is a deeply hypocritical affair, for although Vittoria is publicly shamed, Bracciano escapes largely unscathed. The outcome of the trial therefore suggests that women are not permitted the same freedoms that men can expect to enjoy. Accordingly, Vittoria points out the cynical and vacuous nature of the trial, criticizing Monticelso for acting as both judge and prosecutor. The fact that Monticelso later becomes Pope shows the extent to which the discrimination against her is institutionalized.
Although Vittoria is mistreated due to her a status as a woman, the fact remains that she is not a moral person, for she conspires to have her husband killed and manipulates those around her through seduction and lies. In this respect, she is very much her brother’s sister. Importantly, both Vittoria and Flaminio are criticized by their mother, Cornelia. The condemnations of Cornelia hold more weight in the play because, as a woman, she is similarly marginalized by society, but she has not resorted to immoral means to improve her station. Cornelia is therefore presented as an example of permissible femininity, while Vittoria’s self-aware sexuality is portrayed as cynical, immoral, and lamentable. As such, the play condemns and sympathizes with Vittoria in equal measure, recognizing her mistreatment while criticizing her for fighting back in a way that is deemed to be morally reprehensible.
Bracciano is a powerful man who finds his marriage to Isabella to tragically loveless, and he does not acknowledge her ongoing devotion to him despite his many flaws. Intent upon indulging his own immoral affair with Vittoria, another married woman, he decides to murder both Isabella and Vittoria’s husband, Camillo. Bracciano’s decision to kill two people to satisfy his sexual desires demonstrates his utter lack of morality, which his further emphasized by his proximity to dark, nefarious arts such as conjuring and poison. His willingness to dabble in witchcraft and assassination imply that his crimes are tainted by godlessness an motivated by sin. Ignoring The Dangers of Succumbing to Emotion, he allows himself to be led into a conspiracy of murder, lust, and witchcraft in order to satisfy his desire for Vittoria. In spite of his many crimes, however, he is not persecuted to the same extent as Vittoria. He does not fear religious or legal condemnation because his wealth, status, and power insulate him from any real repercussions. The only person he really fears is Francisco, a man whose wealth and status matches his own. Bracciano’s sense of immunity reflects the power dynamics of Italian society, in which powerful men only fear one another, while women are punished for committing crimes that are easily condoned in men.
At the end of the play, Bracciano is poisoned by Lodovico, and the manner of his death ironically mirrors the murder of Isabella. However, because Bracciano is killed by a criminal, his death does not conform to any sense of justice, nor can it be portrayed as an example of institutional prosecution. When Bracciano dies, his son Giovanni succeeds him. However, because Giovanni has been raised by the immoral Bracciano, the play hints that Giovanni will also perpetuate this violent cycle. Giovanni announces his need for an example in his life, a mentor to teach him how to be a man because his father is little more than a moral vacuum, and it is clear that without guidance, Giovanni is doomed to become as violent as his father. Bracciano does not just fail himself, but also his son and society as a whole.
Lodovico is the first character to speak in The White Devil. At the beginning of the play, he is astonished by the news of his own banishment. Because his debauchery and immorality have gone too far, his presence is no longer tolerated in Rome, and his exile therefore creates an implicit boundary, delineating the moral parameters of Italian society during this time period. The other characters’ actions take place in relation to Lodovico’s exile, and the fact that he is eventually allowed to return to Rome suggests that Italian society does not take immorality seriously, nor does it adequately punish the transgressions involved. Thus, the play suggests that the supposed principles of society ebb and flow in accordance with more mundane social demands. Because the rich and powerful elite are inherently immoral, their attempts to police morality are rendered cynical and ineffective. Thus, as soon as the banished Lodovico becomes useful to the immoral nobles, he is brought back to the city to serve their interests, and his many crimes are overlooked. For this reason, although Francisco may claim to be a moral man, his recruitment of Lodovico to carry out immoral deeds on his behalf indicates that he is as morally bankrupt as his peers. Thus, Lodovico’s banishment is introduced to the audience first so that his subsequent pardon will serve as a demonstration that this inherently immoral society cannot even uphold its own sentencing.
Despite Lodovico’s criminality, he does undergo growth as a character. Although he returns to Rome and takes part in a series of murders for selfish reasons, these scenes of violence and death force him to reflect on his role in the chaos, and he eventually repents, regretting his participation in these events. In a play encompassed by the self-serving lies of so many people, Lodovico’s earnest confession strikes a firm note of contrast, especially when he shows contrition for his misdeeds. Whereas his banishment initially helped to define the moral parameters that the other characters would later breach, his repentance and growth ultimately contrast with the tragic ends of Bracciano, Vittoria, and Flaminio, for unlike them, he is capable of reform.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Tragic Plays
View Collection